BURIAL SITES OF THE KIMAK PERIOD: BASED ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOURCES
https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.25.v78.i3.06
Abstract
The problem of studying the Kimak period's archaeological sites on Kazakhstan's territory is one of the unresolved topics that requires a comprehensive study. In the period from the end of the XIX century to the middle of the XX century, information about the sites of the Kimaks was scarce in the reports of various expeditions, only from the 50s of the XX century throughout the Irtysh, Tarbagatai and Alakol region F.H. Arslanova began to conduct comprehensive studies, classifying funerary and memorial monuments of the Turks of the early Middle Ages and separately identified the sites of the Kimak period. A.G. Maksimova and E.I. Ageyeva also proposed the periodization of the early Turks. Until the 80s of the 20th century, there were active studies of Kimak burial sites, but during the next 30 years, this topic was forgotten entirely. Currently, in the archaeology of Kazakhstan, funerary and memorial sites of the Kimak period are one of the most unexplored topics.
Aims and objectives of the work: The study aims to systematize and collect data on the material and spiritual culture of the Kimak period based on archaeological research materials. Data from funerary monuments were collected and analyzed to achieve this goal, and comparative historical and typological research methods were applied. Results: The study revealed that there is not enough comprehensive archaeological work in Kazakhstan to identify funeral and memorial complexes of the Kimak period.
The work uses research from the 60s of the 20th century to the present day.
About the Authors
S. SagyndykovaKazakhstan
Symbat Sagyndykova – a doctoral student at the Department of Archeology,
Ethnology and Museology
Almaty
G. Omarov
Kazakhstan
Gani Omarov – Candidate of Historical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Archeology, Ethnology and Museology
Almaty
References
1. Arslanova F.Kh. Kontakty kımakov s samodıısko-ugorskım naselenıem Ob’-Irtyshskogo mezhdurech’ya [Contacts of Kimaks with the Samoyed-Ugric population of the Ob-Irtysh interfluve] // Ocherkı srednevekovoy arheologıı Verhnego Prıırtysh’ya. Astana: Izdatel’skaya gruppa fılıala Instıtuta arheologıı ım. A.H. Margulana v g. Astana. 2013. P. 146-149. [in Russian]
2. Kumekov B.E. Gosudarstvo kimakov IX-XI vv. po arabskim istochnikam. [The Kimak state of the IX-XI centuries according to Arabic sources]. Alma-Ata: Nauka. 1972. 156 p. [in Russian]
3. Ismagulov O. Naselenıe Kazahstana ot epohı bronzy do sovremennostı (paleoantropologıcheskoe ıssledovanıe). [The population of Kazakhstan from the Bronze Age to the present (paleoanthropological study)]. Alma-Ata: «Nauka» Kazahskoy SSR. 1970. 237 p. [in Russian]
4. Arslanova F.Kh., Yermolaeva A.S. Pamyatniki kimakov levoberezh’ya Irtysha [Sites of the Kimaks of the left bank of the Irtysh] // Etnicheskaya istoriya turkoyazychnyh narodov Sibiri i sopredel’nyh territorii: Tezisy dokladov oblastnoy nauchnoy konferentsii po antropologii, arheologii i etnografii. Omsk. 1984. P. 141–145. [in Russian]
5. Trıfonov U.I. Akchıı II. [Akshi II]. // Arheologıcheskıe pamyatnıkı v zone zatoplenıya Shul’bınskoy GES. Alma-Ata: Nauka. 1987. P. 150-168. [in Russian]
6. Trıfonov U.I., Samashev Z. Karashat I. [Karashat I]. // Arheologıcheskıe pamyatnıkı v zone zatoplenıya Shul’bınskoy GES. Alma-Ata: Nauka. 1987. P.176-215. [in Russian]
7. Trıfonov U.I., Samashev Z. Karashat II. [Karashat II]. // Arheologıcheskıe pamyatnıkı v zone zatoplenıya Shul’bınskoy GES. Alma-Ata: Nauka. 1987. P.215-230. [in Russian]
8. Savınov D.G. Rasselenıe kımakov po arheologıcheskım dannym. [Settlement of the Kimaks according to archaeological data]. // Proshloe Kazahstana po arheologıcheskım ıstochnıkam. Alma-Ata. 1976. P. 94-104. [in Russian]
9. Gorbunov V.V. Mechı ı sablı kımakov vostochnogo Kazahstana [Swords and sabers of Kimaks of East Kazakhstan] // Trudy Sed’moy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-praktıcheskoy konferentsıı «Voına ı oruzhıe. Novye materıaly i ıssledovanıya» v pyati chastyah. Chast’ 2. Sankt- Peterburg: VIMAIVıVS. 2016. P. 131-148. [in Russian]
10. Artykbaev Zh. Srednee Prıırtysh’e v kontekste problem ıstorıı Evrazııskıh stepey / etnoıstorıcheskıı i etnoarheologıcheskıı opyt ıssledovanıya. [The Middle Irtysh region in the context of the problems of the history of the Eurasian steppes / ethnohistorical and ethnoarchaeological research experience]. T. I. Pavlodar: TOO NPF «EKO». 2007. 267 p. [in Russian]
11. Dashkovskıı P.K., Samashev Z., Tıshkın A.A. Kompleks arheologıcheskıh pamyatnıkov Aına-Bulak v Verhnem Prıırtysh’e (Vostochnyı Kazahstan). [Aina-Bulak complex of archaeological monuments in the Upper Irtysh region (East Kazakhstan)]. Barnaul: Azbuka. 2007. 96 p. [in Russian]
12. Samashev Z. Pamyatnıkı srednevekovyh kochevnıkov verhovıı r.Karakaba v Kazahskom Altae. [Monuments of medieval nomads of the upper reaches of the Kara-Kaba River in the Kazakh Altai]. // Altaı v krugu evrazııskıh drevnostey / otv. red. A.P. Derevyanko, V.I. Molodın. Novosıbırsk: IAET SO RAN. 2016. P. 379-409. [in Russian]
13. Omarov G.K., Besetaev B.B., Baımuhanov N.B., Sagyndykova S.T. Vooruzhenıe ı konskoe snaryazhenıe srednevekovyh kochevnıkov Vostochnogo Kazahstana (po materıalam mogıl’nıka Ayan). [Armament and horse equipment of medieval nomads of East Kazakhstan (based on the materials of the Ayan burial ground)]. // «Mır bol’shogo Altaya» mezhdunarodnyı nauchnyı zhurnal / glavnyı redaktor - Danıal Ahmetov. Oskemen. № 6(2). 2020. P. 941-958. [in Russian]
14. Omarov G., Besetayev B., Sagyndykova S. Horse equipment of medieval nomads of the Kazakh Altai (based on materials from the Tuyetas burial ground) // Archaeological Research in Asia. Volume 31. 2022. Pp.1-15. [in English]
15. Arslanova F.Kh. O svyazyah plemen Verhnego Prıırtysh’ya s naselenıem Uzhnogo Urala ı Povolzh’ya [About the relations of the tribes of the Upper Irtysh region with the population of the Southern Urals and the Volga region] // Ocherkı srednevekovoy arheologıı Verhnego Prıırtysh’ya. Astana: Izdatel’skaya gruppa fılıala Instıtuta arheologıı ım. A.H. Margulana v g. Astana. 2013. P. 140-146. [in Russian]
16. Gavrılova A.A. Mogıl’nık Kudyrge kak ıstochnık po ıstorıı altaıskıh plemen. [Kudyrge burial ground as a source on the history of Altai tribes]. Moskva. 1965. 72 p. [in Russian]
17. Gryaznov M.P. Istorıya drevnıh plemen verhneı Obı. [The history of the ancient tribes of the Upper Ob]. MIA, №48. 1956. 151 p. [in Russian]
18. Gorbunov V.V., Tıshkın A.A. Kurgany srostkınskoy kul’tury na Prıobskom plato. [Mounds of the Srostkin culture on the Priobsky plateau]. Barnaul: Izd-vo Alt. un-ta. 2022. 320 p. [in Russian]
19. Ageeva E.I., Maksimova A.G. Otchet Pavlodarskoy ekspeditsii 1955 goda [The report of the Pavlodar expedition in 1955] // Trudy instituta istorii, arheologii i etnografii AN KazSSR / otvet.redaktor K.A. Akishev. Tom 7. Alma-Ata:izdatel’stvo An KazSSR. 1959. P. 32-58. [in Russian]
20. Arslanova F.Kh. Bobrovskıı mogıl’nık [Bobrov burial ground] // Ocherkı srednevekovoy arheologii Verhnego Prıırtysh’ya. Astana: Izdatel’skaya gruppa fılıala Instıtuta arheologıı ım. A.H. Margulana v g. Astana. 2013. P. 151-165. [in Russian]
21. Omarov G.K. Shygys Qazaqstan oblysy Kurshim audanynyn arheologıalyq eskertkishteri / Gylymı-zertteu zhumysy jonindegi (qorytyndy) esebi. [Archaeological sites of Kurchum District of East Kazakhstan region / report on research work (Final)]. Almaty. 2014. 125 p. // KazGOSINTI. Inv № 0213RK02568. [in Kazakh]
22. Kırpıchnıkov A.N. Snaryazhenıe vsadnıka ı verhovogo konya na Rusı IX-XIII vv. [Equipment of a rider and a riding horse in Russia of the IX-XIII centuries.] // AN SSSR. IA. L: Nauka. 112 p. [in Russian]
23. Gorbunov V.V., Tıshkın A.A. Mech ız rannesrednevekovogo pamyatnıka Srostkı – I na Altae. [A sword from the early medieval monument of Srostki – I in Altai] // Sbornık v chest’ 70-letıya prof. doktora Borıs D. Borısova. Sofıya: «Faber», Velıko Tyrnovo. 2023. P. 261-271. [in Russian]
24. Samashev Z., Aitkali A., Kurmangaliev A.K., Sevinc E. Predvaritel’nye rezul’taty issledovaniya kurganov drevneturkskoy epohi iz doliny Eleke Sazy v 2021 godu. [Preliminary results of the study of ancient Turkic burial mounds from the Eleke Sazy Valley in 2021]. // Altai – turkı alemının altyn besıgı: zertteuler zhinagy. Us’tKamenogorsk. 2021. P. 129-137. [in Russian]
25. Samashev Z., Aıtkalı A., Zhangalıev Ý., Rahmankulov E.. Kurgany kımakskogo vremenı na mogıl’nıke Kansar v Kazahskom Altae. [Burial mounds of the Kimak period at the Kansar burial ground in the Kazakh Altai]. // Altaı – turkі alemіnіn altyn besіgі: zertteuler zhınagy. Kokshetau: «Kokshe-Polıgrafıya» AQ. 2022. P. 246-253. [in Russian]
26. Arslanova F.Kh., Klyashtornyı S.G. Runıcheskaya nadpıs’ na zerkale ız Verhnego Prıırtysh’ya [Runic inscription on the mirror from the Upper Irtysh region] // Turkologıcheskıı sbornık-1972. M. 1973. P. 306-315. [in Russian]
27. Omarov G.K., Bazylhan N. Shygys Qazaqstan oblysy Qabyrgataldan zhanadan tabylgan kone turık bıtık zhazuly eskertkısh turaly (algashqy taldau). [About the recently discovered ancient Turkic written monument from Kabyrgatal, East Kazakhstan region (primary analysis)]. // QazUU habarshysy. Filologiya seriasy. №6 (158). 2015. 168-171 pp. [in Kazakh]
28. Arslanova F.Kh. Kurgany s truposozhzhenıem v Verhnem Prıırtysh’e [Burial mounds with a corpse in the Upper Irtysh region] // Poıskı ı raskopkı v Kazahstane. Alma-Ata. 1972. P. 56-76. [in Russian].
Review
For citations:
Sagyndykova S., Omarov G. BURIAL SITES OF THE KIMAK PERIOD: BASED ON ARCHAEOLOGICAL SOURCES. Bulletin of the Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University. 2025;78(3):73-82. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.25.v78.i3.06