THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONAL VOIDS IN THE SYSTEM OF UNIVERSITY-BUSINESS INTERACTION
https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.25.v78.i3.30
Abstract
This article examines the barriers to interaction between universities and businesses that arise due to changes in their institutional environments. Particular attention is paid to institutional voids, effective cooperation, knowledge transfer, commercialisation of scientific developments, and the development of an innovative ecosystem, as well as the challenges of financing cooperation between science and business.
The purpose of the article is to study and analyze the barriers that arise in the process of interaction between universities and business, which cause differences in their institutional relations. Key factors such as differences in managerial approaches, peculiarities of corporate culture, motivational recommendations and strategic priorities are analyzed. Modern models of university-business interaction are considered, including mechanisms of knowledge transfer, joint research projects, internship programs and ways of commercialization of scientific developments. The main barriers to effective collaboration are identified, including lack of regulation, poor awareness of partnership opportunities, and differences in organizational structures. The study aims to take measures to eliminate these barriers and create more effective cooperation between the academic community and the business environment. As a result of the study, practical recommendations are proposed to address institutional gaps, including improving the regulatory framework, developing partnership models, stimulating cross-sector collaboration and implementing digital solutions. It is expected that these measures will enhance the efficiency of cooperation between universities and businesses, thereby contributing to the development of science, education, and the innovation economy.
About the Authors
G. TaikulakovaKazakhstan
Gulnura Taikulakova – candidate of economic sciences, professor of the School of Economics and Finance
050060, Almaty
L. Bayadilova
Kazakhstan
Laura Bayadilova – master economic sciences, School of Economics and Finance
050060, Almaty
G. Bazarhanova
Kazakhstan
Gauhar Bazarhanova – doctoral PhD student of the School of economics and finance
050060, Almaty
References
1. Mair J., Marti I. (2009) Entrepreneurship in and around institutional voids: A case study from Bangladesh. Journal of Business Venturing. Vol. 24, No. 5. P. 419–435 [in English]
2. Dekel-Dachs D., Najda-Janoszka M., Stokes P., Simba A., Tarba S. (2021) Searching for a new perspective on institutional voids, networks and the internationalisation of SMEs in emerging economies: a systematic literature review. International Marketing Review. Vol. 38, No. 5. P. 879–899 [in English]
3. Meyer K. E., Estrin S., Bhaumik S. K., Peng M. W. (2009) Institutions, resources, and entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal. Vol. 30. P. 61–80 [in English]
4. Ingram P., Silverman B. S. (2000) Introduction: The new institutionalism in strategic management. The New Institutionalism in Strategic Management / P. Ingram, B. S. Silverman (eds.). Leeds: Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Vol. 19. P. 1–30 [in English]
5. Marquis C., Raynard M. (2015) Institutional Strategies in Emerging Markets. The Academy of Management Annals. Vol. 9, No. 1. P. 291–335 [in English]
6. Salazar-Cantú J. J., Husted B. W., Gutiérrez-Garza E., Acuña-Askar K. (2011) Microfinanciamiento para la vivienda progresiva en México: evaluación de los efectos sociales de Patrimonio Hoy en Zinacantepec, Estado de México. Economía, sociedad y territorio. Vol. 11, No. 35. P. 225–251 [in Spanish]
7. Khanna T., Palepu K. G. (2010) Winning in Emerging Markets: A Road Map for Strategy and Execution. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. 272 p. [in English]
8. Craig D., Porter D. (2005) The third way and the third world: poverty reduction and social inclusion strategies in the rise of ‘inclusive’ liberalism. Review of International Political Economy. Vol. 12, No. 2. P. 226–263 [in English]
9. Amini Sedeh A., Pezeshkan A., Caiazza R. (2022) Innovative entrepreneurship in emerging and developing economies: the effects of entrepreneurial competencies and institutional voids. Journal of Technology Transfer. Vol. 47. P. 1198–1223 [in English]
10. Byuro nacional'noj statistiki Agentstva po strategicheskomu planirovaniyu i reformam Respubliki Kazahstan [Bureau of National Statistics of the Agency for Strategic Planning and Reforms of the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Available at: - URL: https://stat.gov.kz [in Russian] (accessed: 15.04.2025)
Review
For citations:
Taikulakova G., Bayadilova L., Bazarhanova G. THE ROLE OF INSTITUTIONAL VOIDS IN THE SYSTEM OF UNIVERSITY-BUSINESS INTERACTION. Bulletin of the Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University. 2025;78(3):351-364. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.25.v78.i3.30