OECD COUNTRIES' EXPERIENCE IN TRANSFORMATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEMS
https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.24.v75.i4.17
Abstract
The article discusses the growing importance of digital transformation in public administration, with a focus on the experiences of various countries like South Korea, the U.S., and Sweden. It examines how governments worldwide are leveraging new technologies such as artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and mobile applications to enhance public service delivery. Key objectives include improving efficiency, transparency, and citizen satisfaction while fostering stronger government-citizen interactions. The article also touches on challenges faced during the digital transformation, such as data protection, coordination, and legal frameworks. The research highlights successful strategies in digital governance, such as South Korea’s leadership in e-government, which enabled it to excel in global rankings. It underscores the significance of strong leadership and comprehensive strategies, including the use of a "control room" to manage inter-departmental coordination. Kazakhstan, which has adopted a new Concept of the development of civil service for 2024-2029, is seeking to apply these international best practices to develop proactive, citizen-centered public services and enhance government efficiency through digitalization.
About the Authors
K. SadykovaUnited States
Kuralay Sadykova – PhD, Visiting Executive Scholar, Maxwell School of Citizenship and Public Affairs
Syracuse, 13078
A. Galy
United States
Abilzhan Galy – Visiting Scholar
Irvine California, 92620
References
1. On approval of the Concept for the development of the civil service of the Republic of Kazakhstan for 2024-2029. Available at: — URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U2400000602 (accessed: 17.09.2024).
2. On approval of the Concept for the development of public administration in the Republic of Kazakhstan until 2030. Available at: — URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/U2100000522 (accessed: 26.08.2024).
3. United Nations. UN e-Government Survey 2018: Gearing e-Government to Support Transformation towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies. – New York: United Nations. Available at: — URL: https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/portals/egovkb/documents/un/2018-survey/e-government%20survey%202018_final%20for%20web.pdf (accessed: 16.09.2024)
4. OECD Digital Government Toolkit. Available at: — URL: https://oecd-opsi.org/toolkits/oecd-digitalgovernment-toolkit/ (accessed: 24.01.2024)
5. Nixon, P., Koutrakou, V. E. (2007). Government in Europe: re-booting the state. 1st edition. 272 p.
6. Income tax: there is even less money left for the payer of the three levels [Income tax: this Monday is the deadline for paying the third third] / BFM Business. 2014. 301 p.
7. The Joint Government Digital Strategy. Available at: — URL: https://en.digst.dk/strategy/the-jointgovernment-digital-strategy/ (accessed: 14.01.2024)
8. United Nations. UN e-Government Survey 2018: Gearing e-Government to Support Transformation towards Sustainable and Resilient Societies. – New York: United Nations. 2018. 19 p.
9. European Union. E-Government in Sweden. Brussels. 2015. 81p.
10. Government Office of Sweden. ICT for Everyone – A Digital Agenda for Sweden. – Stockholm: Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communications. 2011. 450 p.
11. Government Office of Sweden. For Sustainable Digital Transformation in Sweden: A Digital Strategy. Stockholm: Ministry of Enterprise and Innovation. 2017. 505 p.
12. Australian Government. Digital Transformation Agency. Available at: — URL: www.dta.gov.au/ (accessed: 24.01.2024).
13. Leimbach, T. et al. (2014). Potential and impacts of cloud computing services and social network websites. Scientific and Technical Options Assessment. European Parliament. 152 р.
14. Building a long-term strategy for growth through innovation (meeting proceedings). Brookings Institution. 2011. 24 p.
15. Cloud computing: Digital Europe's perspective. Digital Europe. 2011. – 430 p.
16. Gallagher, S. (2014). Update: what Jennifer Lawrence can teach you about cloud security. Technica. 175 p.
17. Mischra, R. (1984). The welfare state in crisis: Social Thoughts and Social Change. Macmillan. 208 p.
18. Bovaird, T., Loeffler, E. (2019). From engagement to co-production: the contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value // International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations. 23(4). P. 1119–1138.
19. Osborne, S., Strokosch, K. (2013). It Takes Two to Tango? Understanding the Co-Production of Public Services by Integrating the Services Management and Public Administration Perspectives // British Journal of Management. –24, S1. – P. 31-47.
20. OECD. 2023 OECD Digital Government Index. Available at: — URL: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2023-oecd-digital-government-index_1a89ed5e-en.html (accessed: 12.09.2024)
Review
For citations:
Sadykova K., Galy A. OECD COUNTRIES' EXPERIENCE IN TRANSFORMATION OF PUBLIC SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEMS. Bulletin of the Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University. 2024;75(4):195-208. https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.24.v75.i4.17