STUDY ON THE ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN MONOTOWNS: KHROMTAU CITY
https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.24.v75.i4.26
Abstract
In recent decades, the government of Kazakhstan has been actively addressing the problems of single-industry towns, paying significant attention to this area and continuously developing support measures. Out of 89 cities in Kazakhstan, 27 are single-industry towns, home to approximately 1.4 million people, with over 30 town-forming enterprises. The development program for single-industry towns was implemented in several key directions, which remain relevant today. These include economic diversification, developing small and medium-sized businesses (SMEs), increasing employment levels, and developing engineering infrastructure. Within the program, singleindustry towns were categorized into three groups: towns with high, medium, and low development potential. Towns with low development potential include Arkalyk in the Kostanay region and Zhanatas in the Talas district of the Zhambyl region. Single-industry towns with high development potential include Zhanaozen, Zhezkazgan, and Aksay, as well as Khromtau in the Aktobe region and Balkhash, Temirtau in the Karaganda region. Single-industry towns continue to face unresolved issues, such as population decline, depletion of natural resources, industrial production downturn, deteriorating infrastructure, and weak economic diversification.
Research objective: To assess the effectiveness of support measures for entrepreneurs in the single-industry town of Khromtau and their impact on improving the quality of life. This research provides insights into how entrepreneurship support measures affect the development of Khromtau, a town dependent on natural resources. Additionally, it offers a deep understanding of the social and economic consequences of entrepreneurship support measures, which is crucial for the sustainable community development of single-industry towns.
About the Authors
М. SaimovaKazakhstan
Meiramkul Saimova - corresponding author, PhD, associate professor of the Department of Public Administration, “Finance and Marketing”
Aktobe, 030000
N. Tovma
Kazakhstan
Natalia Tovma - candidate of economic sciences, associate professor of the Department "Business and Marketing"
Almaty, 050040
B. Almukhambetova
Kazakhstan
Botagoz Almukhambetova - candidate of economic sciences, associate professor of the Department "Tourism"
Turkestan, 161200
B. Mustafayeva
Kazakhstan
Bagila Mustafayeva - PhD
Turkestan, 161200
References
1. Monogoroda Kazahstana: Tekushchaya situaciya i perspektivy razvitiya [Single-industry town of Kazakhstan: Current situation and development prospects]. Available at: — URL:https://dknews.kz/ru/ ekonomika/322081-monogoroda-kazahstana-tekushchaya-situaciya-i [in Russian] (accessed: 10.10.2024).
2. Jūmağūl T.T., Bimendieva L.A., Şurenov N.B., Tovma N.A. Monoqalalardağy demografialyq tendensialardy taldau men memlekettık qoldau şaralary [Analysis of demographic trends and measures of state support in single-industry towns]. «Tūran» universitetınıñ habarşysy» ğylymi jurnaly. № 2(98). 2023. Р.248-258. [in Kazakh]
3. Heidi Tiainen, Rauno Sairinen, Viktor Novikov (2014) Mining in the Chatkal Valley in Kyrgyzstan— Challenge of social sustainability. Resources Policy. Vol. 5. P. 80-87. [in English]
4. Kataro Galasso Gamo, Ramakrishna Gollagari (2020). Role of Local Government and MSMEs Performance: The Case of Ethiopia. International Journal of Small and Medium Enterprises. Vol. 3. P. 1-18 [in English]
5. Pekovic, S., Vukcevic, J., Stanovic, T., & Perovic, D. (2017, January 1). The new geography of tourism consumption: the example of Montenegro. Р. 246-250. https://ideas.repec.org/h/zbw/entr17/183782.html
6. Ridzwan R., Ramzi M.I. & Zubir A.M. (2021) Success factors of rural entrepreneurs in Malaysia: A proposed model. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences Vol 11(4). P.315-323, [in English]
7. Sharif N.M. & Lonik K.T. (2014) Entrepreneurship as a catalyst for the development of rural tourism. SHS Web of Conferences. - France. Vol 12. P. 1-5. [in English]
8. Ansari B., Mirdamadi S.M., Zand A., & Arfai M. (2013) Sustainable entrepreneurship in rural areas. Research Journal of Environmental and Earth Sciences. Vol 5(1). P. 26-31. [in English]
9. Geleta D. (2013) Socio-economic contribution of micro and small enterprises: a case study of Jimma city. Science, Technology, and Arts Research Journal. Vol 2. P. 123-134. [in English]
10. Troyanskaya M., Shalgimbayeva K., Zhumabekova (2023). Vector autoregressive analysis of the relationship between renewable energy consumption and economic development in Turkey and Kazakhstan. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy. Vol 13 (2). P. 309-315 [in English]
11. Gwidja S.A., Heresia-Eke K., Iwu K.G. (2014) Assessing the impact of support structures and initiatives on youth entrepreneurship development in a selected township in the Western Cape Province of South Africa. Mediterranean Center for Social and Educational Research. Vol 5 (1). P. 61-68. [in English]
12. Kocharnaya G., Divichenko O.I., Demenenko I.A. (2018) Formation of an entrepreneurial climate as a factor in the socio-economic development of the region. SHS Web Conf. Vol 50. P. 1-5 [in English]
Review
For citations:
Saimova М., Tovma N., Almukhambetova B., Mustafayeva B. STUDY ON THE ROLE OF ENTREPRENEURSHIP IN IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF LIFE IN MONOTOWNS: KHROMTAU CITY. Bulletin of the Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University. 2024;75(4):300-313. https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.24.v75.i4.26