Preview

Bulletin of the Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University

Advanced search

REFUSAL OF THE ACCUSATORY BIAS AT THE STAGE OF PRE-TRIAL INVESTIGATION IS ONE OF THE WAYS TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CITIZENS

https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.2020.v58.i3.17

Abstract

 The article deals with the issues of reforming the law enforcement and judicial system in the protection of constitutional rights and freedoms of citizens, which was raised in recent years by the Head of state Kassym-Jomrt Kemelovich in his Address to the people of Kazakhstan on September 1, 2020. In the system of law enforcement agencies, there is still an accusatory bias from which it is still not possible to get rid of.
The stage where the greatest violation of the constitutional rights of citizens involved in the orbit of criminal prosecution occurs is the pre-trial stage of the investigation. Therefore, special attention should be paid to this stage of the criminal process. In addition, a significant layer of problems is not only in the procedural, but also in the organizational and legal sphere. In this regard, the provisions of the CPC of the Republic of Kazakhstan related to evidentiary activities in pre-trial proceedings should be considered in the format of new tasks and updated functions of the pre-trial investigation  bodies, the Prosecutor, the investigating judge and the lawyer.
If Kazakhstan resolves the question repeatedly raised by the Leader of the  nation about the true, rather than illusory, institutional independence of the judge in the administration of justice within the judicial system itself, then procedural and technical problems, including the deformalization of  evidence, will become secondary and will be resolved in a fair trial without the influence of the materials of the criminal case in any form.
 

About the Author

R. Shaikhadenov
Kh.Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University
Kazakhstan

 PhD, Associate Professor of Department of criminal law disciplines 



References

1. 1 Memleket basshysy Qasym-Jomart Toqaevtyń Qazaqstan halqyna Joldaýy. 2020 jylǵy 1 qyrkúıek. https://egemen.kz/article/246495-memleket-basshysy-1-qyrkuyekte-qazaqstan-khalqynazholdauyn-dgariyalaydy

2. 2 Kozýbenko Iý.V. Ýgolovnoe presledovanıe kak element mehanızma ýgolovno-pravovogo regýlırovanııa. Gosýdarstvo ı pravo. 2008, № 2, s. 108-113.

3. 3 Ların A.M. Rassledovanıe po ýgolovnomý delý: protsessýalnye fýnktsıı. M., 1986. S.25.

4. 4 Smırnov A.V. Deformalızatsııa ýgolovnogo presledovanııa - glavnaıa zadacha reformy ýgolovnogo sýdoproızvodstva // Obvınenıe ı zaıta po ýgolovnym delam: ıstorıcheskıı opyt ı sovremennost. - SPb. :Iýrıd. tsentr, 2015. - S. 80-88

5. 5 Rýnovskıı A.V. Dıfferentsıatsııa ýgolovno-protsessýalnyh form dosýdebnogo proızvodstva po delam pýblıchnogo obvınenııa: Dıs… kand. ıýrıd. naýk. M., 2012. – 240 s.

6. 6 Golovko L.V. Perspektıvy reformırovanııa organov, osýestvlıaıýıh obespechenıe bezopasnostı ı borbý s prestýpnostıý v Respýblıke Kazahstan Vestnık prava Respýblıkı Kazahstan. – 2010 - S. 38-43

7. 7 Ahpanov A.N., Týkıev A.S., Kazıev Z.G. Ýgolovnoe dosýdebnoe proızvodstvo v RK: trend ınstıtýtsıonalnyh preobrazovanıı. Rejım dostýpa: https://www.zakon.kz/4863385-ugolovnoedosudebnoe-proizvodstvo-v-rk.html


Review

For citations:


Shaikhadenov R. REFUSAL OF THE ACCUSATORY BIAS AT THE STAGE OF PRE-TRIAL INVESTIGATION IS ONE OF THE WAYS TO PROTECT THE CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF CITIZENS. Bulletin of the Khalel Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University. 2020;58(3):117-124. (In Kazakh) https://doi.org/10.47649/vau.2020.v58.i3.17

Views: 339


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2077-0197 (Print)
ISSN 2790-332X (Online)