THE COURT EXAMINATION IS THE FORM OF IMPLEMENTATION OF JUSTICE IN CRIMINAL CASES

The author explores the problematic issues of the trial from the standpoint of the implementation of justice in criminal cases. Noting that justice is the exclusive competence of the court, that the establishment of special and extraordinary courts is prohibited by the Constitution, the author emphasizes the particular importance of the principles of criminal procedure in judicial proceedings. The achievement of the goals of the criminal process is analyzed, in general, through the phased and intersecting achievement of the intermediate goals of the parties. The structure of the trial, its purpose is considered. Litigation is, first of all, a criminal procedure study. But this fact does not exclude the presence of other stages of proof. The materials of the pre-trial investigation, the evidence collected in the court session are checked and examined. Under the study in this case, one must understand the study, analysis of the materials of the criminal case, primarily evidence and their sources, conditions for obtaining. The study involves the knowledge of the essence of the evidence in their totality.
The special role of the judicial investigation as the central part of the main trial is emphasized. The author comes to the conclusion that careful regulation of the main trial in the context of a smooth transition to the Anglo-Saxon model of criminal justice is an inevitable necessity. Proposals for reforming the judicial system within the framework of 24 steps require detailed analysis and discussion by the entire legal community.
In the light of the reforms proposed by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan, agreement was expressed with plans to separate the institution of misdemeanors from crimes, digitize the formation of a list of jurors, involve the executive branch and the public in resolving issues at the stage of execution of a sentence, and limit the scope of detention. At the same time, it raises doubts about the exclusion of the presentation of case materials in court proceedings.

1. O sudebnom prigovore. [About the judgment]. Normativnoye postanovleniye Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 20 aprelya 2018 goda № 4. Available at: — URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P180000004S [in Russian]. (accessed: 30.07.2022)

2. O nekotorykh voprosakh primeneniya zakonodatel'stva o sudebnoy vlasti v Respublike Kazakhstan [On some issues of application of legislation on the judiciary in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. Normativnoye postanovleniye Verkhovnogo suda Respubliki Kazakhstan ot 14 maya 1998 goda № 1. Available at: — URL: https://adilet.zan.kz/rus/docs/P98000001S [in Russian]. (accessed: 30.07.2022)

3. Zhamiyeva R.M. Rol' chrezvychaynykh i spetsial'nykh sudov v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve RK [The role of emergency and special courts in the criminal proceedings of the Republic of Kazakhstan] Problemy ugolovno-protsessual'nogo prava: Materialy mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii, posvyashchennoy 20-letiyu kafedry ugolovnogo protsessa KarYUI MVD RK im. B.Beysenova (1 iyunya 2006 g.). Karaganda. 2018. Р. 90-95 [in Russian]

4. Khmyrov A.A. Kosvennyye dokazatel'stva [Circumstantial evidence]. M.: Yurid.lit. 2017. 250 р. [in Russian]

5. Zhogina N.V. Teoriya dokazatel'stv v sovetskom ugolovnom protsesse [The theory of evidence in the Soviet criminal process] M.: Yurid.lit. 2017. 736 р. [in Russian]

6. Karneyeva L. Ugolovno-protsessual'nyy zakon i praktika dokazyvaniya [Criminal Procedure Law and Evidence Practice]. Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. № 1. 2019. 33 р. [in Russian]

7. Uil'yam B. Vvedeniye v pravo i pravovuyu sistemu SSHA. [William Burnham Introduction to the Law and Legal System of the United States]. Sant-Paul: "Uest". 2018. 742 р. [in Russian]

8. Sudebnoye reformirovaniye [Judicial reform]. Pozitsiya RKA. Available at: — URL: https://www.agka.kz/ru/sudebnoe-reformirovanie-pozicia-rka/ [in Russian]. (accessed: 30.07.2022)

9. Diskussionnyye shagi Verkhovnogo Suda Respubliki Kazakhstan po reformirovaniyu ugolovnogo protsessa [Discussion steps of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Kazakhstan on reforming the criminal process]. Available at: — URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=37403465&pos=25;-28#pos=25;-28 [in Russian]. (accessed: 30.07.2022)

10. Zaklyucheniye po shagu № 5 kazakhstanskoy reformy glavnogo sudebnogo razbiratel'stva po ugolovnym delam L.V. Golovko [Conclusion on step No. 5 of the Kazakhstani reform of the main trial in criminal cases L.V. Golovko] zaveduyushchiy kafedroy ugolovnogo protsessa, pravosudiya i prokurorskogo nadzora yuridicheskogo fakul'teta MGU imeni M.V. Lomonosova, doktor yuridicheskikh nauk, professor. Available at: — URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=33692812&pos=5;-106#pos=5;-106 [in Russian]. (accessed: 30.07.2022)

11. O predlozheniyakh po reformirovaniyu sudebnoy sistemy. [On proposals for reforming the judicial system]. Suleymenova G.ZH., advokat Almatinskoy gorodskoy kollegii advokatov, professor Vysshey shkoly prava «Әdílet» KOU. Available at: — URL: https://online.zakon.kz/Document/?doc_id=33493243&pos=6;-106#pos=6;-106 [in Russian]. (accessed: 30.07.2022)